China vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)
China
-25.67 % change on previous year
in 2023
Latvia
-22.22 % change on previous year
in 1996
China rank
106th
Latvia rank
103rd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports -22.22 % change on previous year against -25.67 % change on previous year in China, a difference of 3.45 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
China ranks 106th and Latvia ranks 103rd of 153 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), China or Latvia?
- Latvia, at -22.22 % change on previous year against -25.67 % change on previous year in China as of 1996.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between China and Latvia?
- 3.45 % change on previous year, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 1996.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
- China ranks 106th and Latvia ranks 103rd of 153 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.