Argentina vs Serbia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time
- Argentina
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 28,881 current US$ against 23,329 current US$ in Argentina, a difference of 5,552 current US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Serbia ahead.
Argentina ranks 118th and Serbia ranks 115th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33,000 current US$ | 862,500 current US$ | 829,500 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 499,030 current US$ | 24,658 current US$ | 474,373 current US$ | Argentina |
| 2020s | 43,946 current US$ | 21,102 current US$ | 22,843 current US$ | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Argentina or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 28,881 current US$ against 23,329 current US$ in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Argentina and Serbia?
- 5,552 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Serbia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Serbia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
- Argentina ranks 118th and Serbia ranks 115th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.