Azerbaijan vs Eritrea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time
- Azerbaijan
- Eritrea
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 19,039 current US$ against 15,216 current US$ in Eritrea, a difference of 3,823 current US$.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.3 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 125th and Eritrea ranks 127th of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,000 current US$ | 1.58 million current US$ | 1.57 million current US$ | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 96,164 current US$ | 90,577 current US$ | 5,587 current US$ | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Azerbaijan or Eritrea?
- Azerbaijan, at 19,039 current US$ against 15,216 current US$ in Eritrea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Azerbaijan and Eritrea?
- 3,823 current US$, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Eritrea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2019.
- How do Azerbaijan and Eritrea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
- Azerbaijan ranks 125th and Eritrea ranks 127th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.