Azerbaijan vs Jamaica: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)
Azerbaijan
19,039 current US$
in 2019
Jamaica
19,489 current US$
in 2023
Azerbaijan rank
125th
Jamaica rank
124th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time
- Azerbaijan
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 19,489 current US$ against 19,039 current US$ in Azerbaijan, a difference of 450 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Jamaica ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 125th and Jamaica ranks 124th of 164 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,000 current US$ | 110,000 current US$ | 100,000 current US$ | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 92,146 current US$ | 400,278 current US$ | 308,132 current US$ | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Azerbaijan or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 19,489 current US$ against 19,039 current US$ in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Azerbaijan and Jamaica?
- 450 current US$, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Jamaica?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2019.
- How do Azerbaijan and Jamaica rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
- Azerbaijan ranks 125th and Jamaica ranks 124th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.