Bangladesh vs Early-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)

Bangladesh
85.06 million current US$
in 2023
Early-demographic dividend
1.42 billion current US$
in 2022
Bangladesh rank
7th
Early-demographic dividend rank
8th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Early-demographic dividend
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B197019962023

How they compare

Early-demographic dividend currently reports 1.42 billion current US$ against 85.06 million current US$ in Bangladesh, a difference of 1.34 billion current US$.

That makes Early-demographic dividend's figure about 16.7 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Early-demographic dividend has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 7th and Early-demographic dividend ranks 8th of 164 countries.

Early-demographic dividend has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Early-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1970s 14.20 million current US$ 304.12 million current US$ 289.92 million current US$ Early-demographic dividend
1980s 17.91 million current US$ 413.17 million current US$ 395.26 million current US$ Early-demographic dividend
1990s 13.31 million current US$ 490.77 million current US$ 477.46 million current US$ Early-demographic dividend
2000s 24.05 million current US$ 765.99 million current US$ 741.94 million current US$ Early-demographic dividend
2010s 67.19 million current US$ 1.66 billion current US$ 1.59 billion current US$ Early-demographic dividend
2020s 85.89 million current US$ 1.41 billion current US$ 1.32 billion current US$ Early-demographic dividend

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Bangladesh or Early-demographic dividend?
Early-demographic dividend, at 1.42 billion current US$ against 85.06 million current US$ in Bangladesh as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Bangladesh and Early-demographic dividend?
1.34 billion current US$, with Early-demographic dividend ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Early-demographic dividend?
52 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2022.
How do Bangladesh and Early-demographic dividend rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
Bangladesh ranks 7th and Early-demographic dividend ranks 8th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Early-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/bangladesh/early-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/bangladesh/early-demographic-dividend/">Bangladesh vs Early-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 7,729 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.