Central Europe and the Baltics vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)

Central Europe and the Baltics
10,000 current US$
in 2010
Tanzania, United Republic of
2.47 million current US$
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
45th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
43rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
05.0M10.0M15.0M196519942023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 2.47 million current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 2.46 million current US$.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 246.6 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 45th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 43rd of 46 groups.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 733,889 current US$ 1.54 million current US$ 801,667 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 276,500 current US$ 1.48 million current US$ 1.20 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 10,000 current US$ 5.97 million current US$ 5.96 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Central Europe and the Baltics or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 2.47 million current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Central Europe and the Baltics and Tanzania, United Republic of?
2.46 million current US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Tanzania, United Republic of?
20 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 45th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 43rd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/central-europe-and-the-baltics/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/central-europe-and-the-baltics/tanzania/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 7,729 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.