Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1.30 million current US$
in 2023
Mozambique
1.74 million current US$
in 2023
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
52nd
Mozambique rank
49th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Mozambique
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M197519992023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 1.74 million current US$ against 1.30 million current US$ in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 443,910 current US$.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.3 times Congo, Democratic Republic of the's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 52nd and Mozambique ranks 49th of 164 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Congo, Democratic Republic of the averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Mozambique Difference Ahead
1980s 600,625 current US$ 4.88 million current US$ 4.28 million current US$ Mozambique
1990s 38,000 current US$ 9.08 million current US$ 9.04 million current US$ Mozambique
2000s 1.36 million current US$ 4.14 million current US$ 2.79 million current US$ Mozambique
2010s 4.67 million current US$ 7.79 million current US$ 3.12 million current US$ Mozambique
2020s 3.14 million current US$ 1.40 million current US$ 1.74 million current US$ Congo, Democratic Republic of the

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 1.74 million current US$ against 1.30 million current US$ in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Mozambique?
443,910 current US$, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Mozambique?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Mozambique rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 52nd and Mozambique ranks 49th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/mozambique/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 7,729 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.