Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1.30 million current US$
in 2023
Rwanda
1.19 million current US$
in 2023
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
52nd
Rwanda rank
55th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Rwanda
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M198220022023

How they compare

Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 1.30 million current US$ against 1.19 million current US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 101,780 current US$.

That makes Congo, Democratic Republic of the's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 52nd and Rwanda ranks 55th of 164 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Congo, Democratic Republic of the averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Rwanda Difference Ahead
1980s 1.52 million current US$ 40,000 current US$ 1.49 million current US$ Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1990s 23,333 current US$ 3.06 million current US$ 3.04 million current US$ Rwanda
2000s 2.09 million current US$ 218,000 current US$ 1.87 million current US$ Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2010s 4.67 million current US$ 2.33 million current US$ 2.33 million current US$ Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2020s 3.14 million current US$ 1.53 million current US$ 1.61 million current US$ Congo, Democratic Republic of the

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Rwanda?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 1.30 million current US$ against 1.19 million current US$ in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Rwanda?
101,780 current US$, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Rwanda?
26 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2023.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 52nd and Rwanda ranks 55th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/rwanda/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 7,729 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.