Congo vs Dominica: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time
- Congo
- Dominica
How they compare
Congo currently reports 35,509 current US$ against 33,676 current US$ in Dominica, a difference of 1,833 current US$.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Dominica's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Dominica ahead.
Congo ranks 111th and Dominica ranks 112th of 164 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Dominica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 15,000 current US$ | 16,667 current US$ | 1,667 current US$ | Dominica |
| 1990s | 10,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | Dominica |
| 2010s | 278,391 current US$ | 310,574 current US$ | 32,183 current US$ | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Congo or Dominica?
- Congo, at 35,509 current US$ against 33,676 current US$ in Dominica as of 2016.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Congo and Dominica?
- 1,833 current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Dominica?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2016.
- How do Congo and Dominica rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
- Congo ranks 111th and Dominica ranks 112th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.