Djibouti vs Montenegro: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time
- Djibouti
- Montenegro
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 11,443 current US$ against 10,058 current US$ in Montenegro, a difference of 1,385 current US$.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 140th and Montenegro ranks 143rd of 164 countries.
Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 81,235 current US$ | 9,971 current US$ | 71,264 current US$ | Djibouti |
| 2020s | 15,441 current US$ | 7,302 current US$ | 8,139 current US$ | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Djibouti or Montenegro?
- Djibouti, at 11,443 current US$ against 10,058 current US$ in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Djibouti and Montenegro?
- 1,385 current US$, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Montenegro?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and Montenegro rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
- Djibouti ranks 140th and Montenegro ranks 143rd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.