Dominica vs Serbia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time
- Dominica
- Serbia
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 33,676 current US$ against 28,881 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 4,795 current US$.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Dominica ranks 112th and Serbia ranks 115th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96,250 current US$ | 166,250 current US$ | 70,000 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 342,008 current US$ | 24,658 current US$ | 317,350 current US$ | Dominica |
| 2020s | 34,949 current US$ | 21,102 current US$ | 13,847 current US$ | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Dominica or Serbia?
- Dominica, at 33,676 current US$ against 28,881 current US$ in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Dominica and Serbia?
- 4,795 current US$, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Serbia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
- Dominica ranks 112th and Serbia ranks 115th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.