Eswatini vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time
- Eswatini
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 105,295 current US$ against 99,450 current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 5,845 current US$.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 89th and Uruguay ranks 87th of 164 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 594,000 current US$ | 14,000 current US$ | 580,000 current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 246,250 current US$ | 10,833 current US$ | 235,417 current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 1.68 million current US$ | 108,967 current US$ | 1.57 million current US$ | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Eswatini or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 105,295 current US$ against 99,450 current US$ in Eswatini as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Eswatini and Uruguay?
- 5,845 current US$, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Uruguay?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2017.
- How do Eswatini and Uruguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
- Eswatini ranks 89th and Uruguay ranks 87th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.