Europe & Central Asia vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)

Europe & Central Asia
16.22 million current US$
in 2023
Zimbabwe
4.22 million current US$
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia rank
36th
Zimbabwe rank
39th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Zimbabwe
020.0M40.0M60.0M196519942023

How they compare

Europe & Central Asia currently reports 16.22 million current US$ against 4.22 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 12.00 million current US$.

That makes Europe & Central Asia's figure about 3.8 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 39th of 46 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 2,000 current US$ 28,000 current US$ 26,000 current US$ Zimbabwe
1970s 130,000 current US$ 190,000 current US$ 60,000 current US$ Zimbabwe
1980s 47,000 current US$ 3.05 million current US$ 3.00 million current US$ Zimbabwe
1990s 6.16 million current US$ 4.97 million current US$ 1.19 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia
2000s 1.01 million current US$ 7.04 million current US$ 6.03 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 1.27 million current US$ 21.24 million current US$ 19.97 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 17.07 million current US$ 2.86 million current US$ 14.20 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Europe & Central Asia or Zimbabwe?
Europe & Central Asia, at 16.22 million current US$ against 4.22 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Europe & Central Asia and Zimbabwe?
12.00 million current US$, with Europe & Central Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Zimbabwe?
50 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 39th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/europe-and-central-asia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/europe-and-central-asia/zimbabwe/">Europe & Central Asia vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 7,729 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.