Jamaica vs Kazakhstan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time
- Jamaica
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 19,489 current US$ against 18,047 current US$ in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1,442 current US$.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 124th and Kazakhstan ranks 126th of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 43,571 current US$ | 97,381 current US$ | 53,810 current US$ | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 203,485 current US$ | 79,024 current US$ | 124,462 current US$ | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Jamaica or Kazakhstan?
- Jamaica, at 19,489 current US$ against 18,047 current US$ in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Jamaica and Kazakhstan?
- 1,442 current US$, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Kazakhstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2018.
- How do Jamaica and Kazakhstan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
- Jamaica ranks 124th and Kazakhstan ranks 126th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.