Jordan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)

Jordan
3.96 million current US$
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
2.47 million current US$
in 2023
Jordan rank
40th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
43rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time

  • Jordan
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196519942023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 3.96 million current US$ against 2.47 million current US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 1.49 million current US$.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.6 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Jordan ranks 40th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 43rd of 164 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1970s 30,000 current US$ 2.20 million current US$ 2.17 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 471,000 current US$ 5.61 million current US$ 5.14 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 256,500 current US$ 2.18 million current US$ 1.93 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 49,000 current US$ 1.48 million current US$ 1.43 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 6.51 million current US$ 6.29 million current US$ 215,532 current US$ Jordan
2020s 7.18 million current US$ 1.96 million current US$ 5.22 million current US$ Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Jordan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Jordan, at 3.96 million current US$ against 2.47 million current US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Jordan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
1.49 million current US$, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
Jordan ranks 40th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 43rd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/jordan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/jordan/tanzania/">Jordan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 7,729 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.