Malawi vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time
- Malawi
- South Sudan
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 2.39 million current US$ against 2.12 million current US$ in South Sudan, a difference of 265,100 current US$.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 44th and South Sudan ranks 47th of 164 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.44 million current US$ | 15.80 million current US$ | 9.36 million current US$ | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 1.59 million current US$ | 3.76 million current US$ | 2.16 million current US$ | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Malawi or South Sudan?
- Malawi, at 2.39 million current US$ against 2.12 million current US$ in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Malawi and South Sudan?
- 265,100 current US$, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and South Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
- Malawi ranks 44th and South Sudan ranks 47th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.