Malawi vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)

Malawi
2.39 million current US$
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
2.47 million current US$
in 2023
Malawi rank
44th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
43rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time

  • Malawi
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M196519942023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 2.47 million current US$ against 2.39 million current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 77,700 current US$.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Malawi ranks 44th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 43rd of 164 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 54,000 current US$ 102,000 current US$ 48,000 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1970s 97,000 current US$ 1.08 million current US$ 988,000 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 876,000 current US$ 5.61 million current US$ 4.74 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 1.77 million current US$ 2.18 million current US$ 415,000 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 1.61 million current US$ 1.48 million current US$ 132,000 current US$ Malawi
2010s 6.19 million current US$ 6.29 million current US$ 98,791 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 1.59 million current US$ 1.96 million current US$ 368,920 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Malawi or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 2.47 million current US$ against 2.39 million current US$ in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Malawi and Tanzania, United Republic of?
77,700 current US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tanzania, United Republic of?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
Malawi ranks 44th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 43rd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/malawi/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/malawi/tanzania/">Malawi vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 7,729 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.