Moldova vs Tajikistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia … Australia gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia … Australia gaps over time
- Moldova
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 416 current US$ against 337 current US$ in Tajikistan, a difference of 79 current US$.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.2 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Moldova ranks 158th and Tajikistan ranks 159th of 164 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 288,496 current US$ | 564,555 current US$ | 276,060 current US$ | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 10,359 current US$ | 138,426 current US$ | 128,067 current US$ | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Moldova or Tajikistan?
- Moldova, at 416 current US$ against 337 current US$ in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Moldova and Tajikistan?
- 79 current US$, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Tajikistan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Moldova and Tajikistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
- Moldova ranks 158th and Tajikistan ranks 159th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.