OECD members vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)

OECD members
180,000 current US$
in 2022
Tanzania, United Republic of
2.47 million current US$
in 2023
OECD members rank
43rd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
43rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time

  • OECD members
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
05.0M10.0M15.0M196519942023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 2.47 million current US$ against 180,000 current US$ in OECD members, a difference of 2.29 million current US$.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 13.7 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was OECD members ahead.

OECD members ranks 43rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 43rd of 46 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, OECD members averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1970s 573,000 current US$ 1.08 million current US$ 512,000 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 831,000 current US$ 5.61 million current US$ 4.78 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 1.20 million current US$ 2.18 million current US$ 984,000 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 673,000 current US$ 1.48 million current US$ 808,000 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 3.67 million current US$ 6.29 million current US$ 2.62 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 1.87 million current US$ 1.79 million current US$ 73,603 current US$ OECD members

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), OECD members or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 2.47 million current US$ against 180,000 current US$ in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between OECD members and Tanzania, United Republic of?
2.29 million current US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Tanzania, United Republic of?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do OECD members and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
OECD members ranks 43rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 43rd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/oecd-members/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/oecd-members/tanzania/">OECD members vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 7,729 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.