OECD members vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)

OECD members
180,000 current US$
in 2022
Zambia
2.22 million current US$
in 2023
OECD members rank
43rd
Zambia rank
45th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time

  • OECD members
  • Zambia
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M196519942023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 2.22 million current US$ against 180,000 current US$ in OECD members, a difference of 2.04 million current US$.

That makes Zambia's figure about 12.3 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

OECD members ranks 43rd and Zambia ranks 45th of 46 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, OECD members averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 573,000 current US$ 286,000 current US$ 287,000 current US$ OECD members
1980s 831,000 current US$ 1.78 million current US$ 945,000 current US$ Zambia
1990s 1.20 million current US$ 1.81 million current US$ 616,000 current US$ Zambia
2000s 673,000 current US$ 863,000 current US$ 190,000 current US$ Zambia
2010s 3.67 million current US$ 3.65 million current US$ 16,282 current US$ OECD members
2020s 1.87 million current US$ 1.56 million current US$ 308,499 current US$ OECD members

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), OECD members or Zambia?
Zambia, at 2.22 million current US$ against 180,000 current US$ in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between OECD members and Zambia?
2.04 million current US$, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Zambia?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do OECD members and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
OECD members ranks 43rd and Zambia ranks 45th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/oecd-members/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/oecd-members/zambia/">OECD members vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 7,729 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.