Post-demographic dividend vs Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)

Post-demographic dividend
46.07 million current US$
in 2022
Sudan
7.06 million current US$
in 2023
Post-demographic dividend rank
33rd
Sudan rank
31st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time

  • Post-demographic dividend
  • Sudan
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M196519942023

How they compare

Post-demographic dividend currently reports 46.07 million current US$ against 7.06 million current US$ in Sudan, a difference of 39.01 million current US$.

That makes Post-demographic dividend's figure about 6.5 times Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Post-demographic dividend ahead.

Post-demographic dividend ranks 33rd and Sudan ranks 31st of 46 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Post-demographic dividend averaged higher in 3 and Sudan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Post-demographic dividend Sudan Difference Ahead
1970s 1.49 million current US$ 307,000 current US$ 1.19 million current US$ Post-demographic dividend
1980s 7.71 million current US$ 2.08 million current US$ 5.63 million current US$ Post-demographic dividend
1990s 2.54 million current US$ 3.18 million current US$ 643,000 current US$ Sudan
2000s 663,000 current US$ 8.19 million current US$ 7.53 million current US$ Sudan
2010s 611,000 current US$ 7.79 million current US$ 7.17 million current US$ Sudan
2020s 15.44 million current US$ 450,529 current US$ 14.99 million current US$ Post-demographic dividend

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Post-demographic dividend or Sudan?
Post-demographic dividend, at 46.07 million current US$ against 7.06 million current US$ in Sudan as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Post-demographic dividend and Sudan?
39.01 million current US$, with Post-demographic dividend ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Post-demographic dividend and Sudan?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Post-demographic dividend and Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
Post-demographic dividend ranks 33rd and Sudan ranks 31st of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Post-demographic dividend vs Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/post-demographic-dividend/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/post-demographic-dividend/sudan/">Post-demographic dividend vs Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 7,729 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.