Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)

Tanzania, United Republic of
2.47 million current US$
in 2023
Zambia
2.22 million current US$
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
43rd
Zambia rank
45th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) over time

  • Tanzania, United Republic of
  • Zambia
05.0M10.0M15.0M196519942023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 2.47 million current US$ against 2.22 million current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 247,070 current US$.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 43rd and Zambia ranks 45th of 164 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania, United Republic of Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 102,000 current US$ 76,000 current US$ 26,000 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1970s 1.08 million current US$ 286,000 current US$ 799,000 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 5.61 million current US$ 1.78 million current US$ 3.83 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 2.18 million current US$ 1.81 million current US$ 368,000 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 1.48 million current US$ 863,000 current US$ 618,000 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 6.29 million current US$ 3.65 million current US$ 2.64 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 1.96 million current US$ 1.72 million current US$ 237,939 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), Tanzania, United Republic of or Zambia?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 2.47 million current US$ against 2.22 million current US$ in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$) between Tanzania, United Republic of and Zambia?
247,070 current US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Zambia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$)?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 43rd and Zambia ranks 45th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/tanzania/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-gaps-filled/tanzania/zambia/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 7,729 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) with 412 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.