Early-demographic dividend vs Seychelles: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per

Early-demographic dividend
0.4104 current US$ per person
in 2022
Seychelles
13.33 current US$ per person
in 2017
Early-demographic dividend rank
12th
Seychelles rank
14th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Seychelles
0102030197019962022

How they compare

Seychelles currently reports 13.33 current US$ per person against 0.4104 current US$ per person in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 12.92 current US$ per person.

That makes Seychelles's figure about 32.5 times Early-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Early-demographic dividend ahead.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 12th and Seychelles ranks 14th of 46 groups.

Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Seychelles Difference Ahead
1970s 0.2446 current US$ per person 6.22 current US$ per person 5.98 current US$ per person Seychelles
1980s 0.2319 current US$ per person 12.81 current US$ per person 12.58 current US$ per person Seychelles
1990s 0.219 current US$ per person 9.08 current US$ per person 8.86 current US$ per person Seychelles
2000s 0.2162 current US$ per person 0.462 current US$ per person 0.2458 current US$ per person Seychelles
2010s 0.5661 current US$ per person 9.75 current US$ per person 9.19 current US$ per person Seychelles

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Early-demographic dividend or Seychelles?
Seychelles, at 13.33 current US$ per person against 0.4104 current US$ per person in Early-demographic dividend as of 2017.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Early-demographic dividend and Seychelles?
12.92 current US$ per person, with Seychelles ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Seychelles?
36 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2017.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Seychelles rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 12th and Seychelles ranks 14th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Seychelles: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-capita/early-demographic-dividend/seychelles/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-capita/early-demographic-dividend/seychelles/">Early-demographic dividend vs Seychelles: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 7,317 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.