Latin America & Caribbean vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per

Latin America & Caribbean
0.0014 current US$ per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.2583 current US$ per person
in 2023
Latin America & Caribbean rank
42nd
Zimbabwe rank
43rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time

  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Zimbabwe
01234196519942023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.2583 current US$ per person against 0.0014 current US$ per person in Latin America & Caribbean, a difference of 0.2569 current US$ per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 188.7 times Latin America & Caribbean's.

Across all 50 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Latin America & Caribbean ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 43rd of 46 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America & Caribbean Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 current US$ per person 0.0058 current US$ per person 0.0057 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
1970s 0.0012 current US$ per person 0.0286 current US$ per person 0.0274 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0026 current US$ per person 0.3534 current US$ per person 0.3508 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0014 current US$ per person 0.4618 current US$ per person 0.4604 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0031 current US$ per person 0.548 current US$ per person 0.5449 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0353 current US$ per person 1.54 current US$ per person 1.51 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0024 current US$ per person 0.1785 current US$ per person 0.176 current US$ per person Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Latin America & Caribbean or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.2583 current US$ per person against 0.0014 current US$ per person in Latin America & Caribbean as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Latin America & Caribbean and Zimbabwe?
0.2569 current US$ per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & Caribbean and Zimbabwe?
50 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Latin America & Caribbean and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
Latin America & Caribbean ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 43rd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America & Caribbean vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-capita/latin-america-and-caribbean/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-capita/latin-america-and-caribbean/zimbabwe/">Latin America & Caribbean vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 7,317 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.