Barbados vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per

Barbados
558.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Sri Lanka
330.96 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
20th
Sri Lanka rank
22nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time

  • Barbados
  • Sri Lanka
02004006008001.0k196519942023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 558.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 330.96 current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 227.18 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.7 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 20th and Sri Lanka ranks 22nd of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre 17.01 current US$ per square kilometre 6.25 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 75.58 current US$ per square kilometre 65.44 current US$ per square kilometre 10.14 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 32.56 current US$ per square kilometre 62.13 current US$ per square kilometre 29.57 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 93.02 current US$ per square kilometre 91.53 current US$ per square kilometre 1.49 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 93.02 current US$ per square kilometre 271.54 current US$ per square kilometre 178.52 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 558.14 current US$ per square kilometre 976.24 current US$ per square kilometre 418.1 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Barbados or Sri Lanka?
Barbados, at 558.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 330.96 current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2010.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Barbados and Sri Lanka?
227.18 current US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Sri Lanka?
27 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2010.
How do Barbados and Sri Lanka rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
Barbados ranks 20th and Sri Lanka ranks 22nd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/sri-lanka/">Barbados vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 7,203 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.