Central African Republic vs Colombia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per

Central African Republic
0.0184 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia
0.0217 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
143rd
Colombia rank
141st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Colombia
0246198520042023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 0.0217 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0184 current US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0033 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.2 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 143rd and Colombia ranks 141st of 160 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Colombia Difference Ahead
2000s 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4416 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9067 current US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5077 current US$ per square kilometre 2.07 current US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0235 current US$ per square kilometre 2.6 current US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Central African Republic or Colombia?
Colombia, at 0.0217 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0184 current US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Central African Republic and Colombia?
0.0033 current US$ per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Colombia?
13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Colombia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
Central African Republic ranks 143rd and Colombia ranks 141st of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Colombia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/colombia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/colombia/">Central African Republic vs Colombia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 7,203 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.