Central Europe and the Baltics vs North Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.0091 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
North Korea
37.44 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2015
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
44th
North Korea rank
44th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • North Korea
0204060199120032015

How they compare

North Korea currently reports 37.44 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0091 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 37.43 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes North Korea's figure about 4,134.0 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 44th and North Korea ranks 44th of 46 groups.

North Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics North Korea Difference Ahead
1990s 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre 17.77 current US$ per square kilometre 16.73 current US$ per square kilometre North Korea
2000s 0.2149 current US$ per square kilometre 30.06 current US$ per square kilometre 29.85 current US$ per square kilometre North Korea
2010s 0.0091 current US$ per square kilometre 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre North Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Central Europe and the Baltics or North Korea?
North Korea, at 37.44 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0091 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2015.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Central Europe and the Baltics and North Korea?
37.43 current US$ per square kilometre, with North Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and North Korea?
11 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2010.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and North Korea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 44th and North Korea ranks 44th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs North Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/korea-dem-people-s-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/korea-dem-people-s-rep/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs North Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 7,203 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.