Democratic Republic of Congo vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia … Australia square

Democratic Republic of Congo
0.5716 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.6016 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
98th
Uruguay rank
97th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia … Australia square over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Uruguay
012345198220022023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.6016 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.5716 current US$ per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.03 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Uruguay ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 98th and Uruguay ranks 97th of 160 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0176 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1143 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0966 current US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 0.3396 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0571 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2825 current US$ per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6925 current US$ per square kilometre 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Democratic Republic of Congo or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.6016 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.5716 current US$ per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2017.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Democratic Republic of Congo and Uruguay?
0.03 current US$ per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Uruguay?
11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2017.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Uruguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 98th and Uruguay ranks 97th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/uruguay/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 7,203 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.