Congo vs Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per
Congo
0.104 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2016
Tunisia
0.0576 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
133rd
Tunisia rank
135th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time
- Congo
- Tunisia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.104 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0576 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0464 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.8 times Tunisia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 133rd and Tunisia ranks 135th of 160 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Congo or Tunisia?
- Congo, at 0.104 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0576 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Congo and Tunisia?
- 0.0464 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tunisia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2016.
- How do Congo and Tunisia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- Congo ranks 133rd and Tunisia ranks 135th of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.