Dominica vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per

Dominica
44.9 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Dominica rank
42nd
OECD members rank
45th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time

  • Dominica
  • OECD members
05001.0k1.5k197019962023

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 44.9 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 44.89 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Dominica's figure about 8,811.3 times OECD members's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Dominica has been ahead every year.

Dominica ranks 42nd and OECD members ranks 45th of 160 countries.

Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 53.33 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0088 current US$ per square kilometre 53.32 current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
1980s 31.11 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0264 current US$ per square kilometre 31.08 current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
1990s 26.67 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0113 current US$ per square kilometre 26.66 current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
2000s 13.33 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0127 current US$ per square kilometre 13.32 current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
2010s 456.01 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1033 current US$ per square kilometre 455.91 current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
2020s 43 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0071 current US$ per square kilometre 42.99 current US$ per square kilometre Dominica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Dominica or OECD members?
Dominica, at 44.9 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Dominica and OECD members?
44.89 current US$ per square kilometre, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and OECD members?
20 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2021.
How do Dominica and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
Dominica ranks 42nd and OECD members ranks 45th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominica/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominica/oecd-members/">Dominica vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 7,203 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.