Eswatini vs Gambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per

Eswatini
5.78 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
4.57 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Eswatini rank
66th
Gambia rank
69th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Gambia
0100200300400196519942023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 5.78 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.57 current US$ per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Gambia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Gambia ahead.

Eswatini ranks 66th and Gambia ranks 69th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Gambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Gambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7267 current US$ per square kilometre 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7555 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1970s 2.03 current US$ per square kilometre 4.45 current US$ per square kilometre 2.41 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 16.57 current US$ per square kilometre 3.56 current US$ per square kilometre 13.01 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 30.91 current US$ per square kilometre 4.94 current US$ per square kilometre 25.97 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 20.35 current US$ per square kilometre 2.96 current US$ per square kilometre 17.38 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 90.64 current US$ per square kilometre 73.79 current US$ per square kilometre 16.86 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 13.83 current US$ per square kilometre 10.96 current US$ per square kilometre 2.87 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Eswatini or Gambia?
Eswatini, at 5.78 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.57 current US$ per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Eswatini and Gambia?
1.21 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Gambia?
42 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2021.
How do Eswatini and Gambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
Eswatini ranks 66th and Gambia ranks 69th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Gambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/gambia-the/">Eswatini vs Gambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 7,203 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.