Eswatini vs Ghana: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per

Eswatini
5.78 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ghana
7.34 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
66th
Ghana rank
64th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Ghana
0100200300400196519942023

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 7.34 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.78 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ghana's figure about 1.3 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 66th and Ghana ranks 64th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Ghana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Ghana Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7267 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4724 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2543 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 2.03 current US$ per square kilometre 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8525 current US$ per square kilometre Ghana
1980s 16.57 current US$ per square kilometre 3.47 current US$ per square kilometre 13.1 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 26.51 current US$ per square kilometre 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre 25.1 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 12.03 current US$ per square kilometre 0.879 current US$ per square kilometre 11.16 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 83.61 current US$ per square kilometre 13.16 current US$ per square kilometre 70.46 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 9.34 current US$ per square kilometre 5.84 current US$ per square kilometre 3.5 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Eswatini or Ghana?
Ghana, at 7.34 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.78 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Eswatini and Ghana?
1.56 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Ghana?
58 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Ghana rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
Eswatini ranks 66th and Ghana ranks 64th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Ghana: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/ghana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/ghana/">Eswatini vs Ghana: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 7,203 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.