Gabon vs Suriname: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per
Gabon
0.0123 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2016
Suriname
0.0173 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gabon rank
147th
Suriname rank
144th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time
- Gabon
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0.0173 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0123 current US$ per square kilometre in Gabon, a difference of 0.005 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.4 times Gabon's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Suriname ahead.
Gabon ranks 147th and Suriname ranks 144th of 160 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Gabon or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 0.0173 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0123 current US$ per square kilometre in Gabon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Gabon and Suriname?
- 0.005 current US$ per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Suriname?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2016.
- How do Gabon and Suriname rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- Gabon ranks 147th and Suriname ranks 144th of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.