Hong Kong, China vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per

Hong Kong, China
114.29 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Sub-Saharan Africa
3.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
31st
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
30th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196519942023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.14 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 111.15 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 36.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 31st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 30th of 160 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 17.16 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0427 current US$ per square kilometre 17.11 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1970s 21.81 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3092 current US$ per square kilometre 21.5 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1980s 3,997 current US$ per square kilometre 2.09 current US$ per square kilometre 3,995 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 1,915 current US$ per square kilometre 2.92 current US$ per square kilometre 1,912 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Hong Kong, China or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Hong Kong, China, at 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.14 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 1996.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Hong Kong, China and Sub-Saharan Africa?
111.15 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Sub-Saharan Africa?
31 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 1996.
How do Hong Kong, China and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
Hong Kong, China ranks 31st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 30th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/sub-saharan-africa/">Hong Kong, China vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 7,203 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.