IBRD only vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per

IBRD only
6.95 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Sri Lanka
330.96 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only rank
23rd
Sri Lanka rank
22nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time

  • IBRD only
  • Sri Lanka
02004006008001.0k196519942023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 330.96 current US$ per square kilometre against 6.95 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 324.01 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 47.6 times IBRD only's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

IBRD only ranks 23rd and Sri Lanka ranks 22nd of 46 groups.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre 56.35 current US$ per square kilometre 55.22 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre 88.41 current US$ per square kilometre 85.63 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 4.06 current US$ per square kilometre 99.84 current US$ per square kilometre 95.78 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 6.59 current US$ per square kilometre 302.33 current US$ per square kilometre 295.74 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 9.85 current US$ per square kilometre 534.02 current US$ per square kilometre 524.17 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 6.81 current US$ per square kilometre 451.85 current US$ per square kilometre 445.05 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, IBRD only or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 330.96 current US$ per square kilometre against 6.95 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between IBRD only and Sri Lanka?
324.01 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Sri Lanka?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do IBRD only and Sri Lanka rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
IBRD only ranks 23rd and Sri Lanka ranks 22nd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/sri-lanka/">IBRD only vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 7,203 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.