IDA & IBRD total vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per

IDA & IBRD total
19.61 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1,000 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2013
IDA & IBRD total rank
18th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
17th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time

  • IDA & IBRD total
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k197019962022

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 19.61 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 980.39 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 51.0 times IDA & IBRD total's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

IDA & IBRD total ranks 18th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 17th of 46 groups.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA & IBRD total Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1980s 7.41 current US$ per square kilometre 102.56 current US$ per square kilometre 95.15 current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 14.78 current US$ per square kilometre 38.46 current US$ per square kilometre 23.68 current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 29.78 current US$ per square kilometre 1,673 current US$ per square kilometre 1,643 current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, IDA & IBRD total or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 19.61 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total as of 2013.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between IDA & IBRD total and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
980.39 current US$ per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
11 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2013.
How do IDA & IBRD total and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
IDA & IBRD total ranks 18th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 17th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA & IBRD total vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-and-ibrd-total/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-and-ibrd-total/st-kitts-and-nevis/">IDA & IBRD total vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 7,203 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.