IDA blend vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per

IDA blend
131.88 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Tuvalu
755,017 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA blend rank
4th
Tuvalu rank
2nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time

  • IDA blend
  • Tuvalu
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k197019962023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 755,017 current US$ per square kilometre against 131.88 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA blend, a difference of 754,885 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 5,724.8 times IDA blend's.

Across all 47 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.

IDA blend ranks 4th and Tuvalu ranks 2nd of 46 groups.

Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA blend Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1970s 58.56 current US$ per square kilometre 18,333 current US$ per square kilometre 18,275 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
1980s 62.14 current US$ per square kilometre 52,500 current US$ per square kilometre 52,438 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
1990s 56.17 current US$ per square kilometre 67,133 current US$ per square kilometre 67,077 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
2000s 67.04 current US$ per square kilometre 94,233 current US$ per square kilometre 94,166 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
2010s 133.4 current US$ per square kilometre 275,174 current US$ per square kilometre 275,041 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
2020s 140 current US$ per square kilometre 302,561 current US$ per square kilometre 302,421 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, IDA blend or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 755,017 current US$ per square kilometre against 131.88 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA blend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between IDA blend and Tuvalu?
754,885 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Tuvalu?
47 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2022.
How do IDA blend and Tuvalu rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
IDA blend ranks 4th and Tuvalu ranks 2nd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA blend vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-blend/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-blend/tuvalu/">IDA blend vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 7,203 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.