Latin America & Caribbean vs New Caledonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per

Latin America & Caribbean
0.0449 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
35.01 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Latin America & Caribbean rank
42nd
New Caledonia rank
45th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time

  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • New Caledonia
0204060196519942023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 35.01 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0449 current US$ per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean, a difference of 34.97 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 780.0 times Latin America & Caribbean's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.

Latin America & Caribbean ranks 42nd and New Caledonia ranks 45th of 46 groups.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America & Caribbean New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0154 current US$ per square kilometre 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 0.0626 current US$ per square kilometre 4.83 current US$ per square kilometre 4.77 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0.0338 current US$ per square kilometre 45.3 current US$ per square kilometre 45.26 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Latin America & Caribbean or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 35.01 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0449 current US$ per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean as of 1999.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Latin America & Caribbean and New Caledonia?
34.97 current US$ per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & Caribbean and New Caledonia?
17 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 1999.
How do Latin America & Caribbean and New Caledonia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
Latin America & Caribbean ranks 42nd and New Caledonia ranks 45th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America & Caribbean vs New Caledonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/latin-america-and-caribbean/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/latin-america-and-caribbean/new-caledonia/">Latin America & Caribbean vs New Caledonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 7,203 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.