Malawi vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per

Malawi
25.34 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
16.58 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
49th
Uganda rank
52nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time

  • Malawi
  • Uganda
050100150200250196519942023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 25.34 current US$ per square kilometre against 16.58 current US$ per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 8.76 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.5 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 49th and Uganda ranks 52nd of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5728 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3904 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1824 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1970s 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7557 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2731 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 9.29 current US$ per square kilometre 9.5 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2076 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
1990s 18.75 current US$ per square kilometre 5.86 current US$ per square kilometre 12.9 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 17.11 current US$ per square kilometre 6.21 current US$ per square kilometre 10.9 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 65.68 current US$ per square kilometre 23 current US$ per square kilometre 42.67 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 16.89 current US$ per square kilometre 15.61 current US$ per square kilometre 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Malawi or Uganda?
Malawi, at 25.34 current US$ per square kilometre against 16.58 current US$ per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Malawi and Uganda?
8.76 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Uganda?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Uganda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
Malawi ranks 49th and Uganda ranks 52nd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/uganda/">Malawi vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 7,203 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.