Naoero vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per

Naoero
1.08 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
755,017 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Naoero rank
1st
Tuvalu rank
2nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time

  • Naoero
  • Tuvalu
0500.0k1.0M1.5M197519992023

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 1.08 million current US$ per square kilometre against 755,017 current US$ per square kilometre in Tuvalu, a difference of 325,303 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Naoero's figure about 1.4 times Tuvalu's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Tuvalu ahead.

Naoero ranks 1st and Tuvalu ranks 2nd of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Naoero averaged higher in 3 and Tuvalu in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Naoero Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1970s 500 current US$ per square kilometre 27,500 current US$ per square kilometre 27,000 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
1980s 2,222 current US$ per square kilometre 56,518 current US$ per square kilometre 54,296 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
1990s 66,800 current US$ per square kilometre 67,133 current US$ per square kilometre 333.35 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
2000s 698,350 current US$ per square kilometre 94,233 current US$ per square kilometre 604,117 current US$ per square kilometre Naoero
2010s 1.10 million current US$ per square kilometre 275,174 current US$ per square kilometre 828,845 current US$ per square kilometre Naoero
2020s 945,379 current US$ per square kilometre 415,675 current US$ per square kilometre 529,704 current US$ per square kilometre Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Naoero or Tuvalu?
Naoero, at 1.08 million current US$ per square kilometre against 755,017 current US$ per square kilometre in Tuvalu as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Naoero and Tuvalu?
325,303 current US$ per square kilometre, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Tuvalu?
45 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Naoero and Tuvalu rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
Naoero ranks 1st and Tuvalu ranks 2nd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Naoero vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/naoero/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/naoero/tuvalu/">Naoero vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 7,203 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.