OECD members vs Thailand: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per

OECD members
0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Thailand
28.11 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
45th
Thailand rank
48th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time

  • OECD members
  • Thailand
0204060196519942023

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 28.11 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 28.1 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Thailand's figure about 5,516.5 times OECD members's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 45th and Thailand ranks 48th of 46 groups.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Thailand Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0163 current US$ per square kilometre 12.91 current US$ per square kilometre 12.89 current US$ per square kilometre Thailand
1980s 0.0236 current US$ per square kilometre 34.88 current US$ per square kilometre 34.85 current US$ per square kilometre Thailand
1990s 0.0339 current US$ per square kilometre 44.44 current US$ per square kilometre 44.41 current US$ per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 0.019 current US$ per square kilometre 14.92 current US$ per square kilometre 14.9 current US$ per square kilometre Thailand
2010s 0.1033 current US$ per square kilometre 12.31 current US$ per square kilometre 12.2 current US$ per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 0.0526 current US$ per square kilometre 16.65 current US$ per square kilometre 16.6 current US$ per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, OECD members or Thailand?
Thailand, at 28.11 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between OECD members and Thailand?
28.1 current US$ per square kilometre, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Thailand?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do OECD members and Thailand rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
OECD members ranks 45th and Thailand ranks 48th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Thailand: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/thailand/">OECD members vs Thailand: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 7,203 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.