IDA & IBRD total vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per
IDA & IBRD total
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
South Sudan
0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2015
IDA & IBRD total rank
20th
South Sudan rank
21st
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per over time
- IDA & IBRD total
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 14.5 times IDA & IBRD total's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
IDA & IBRD total ranks 20th and South Sudan ranks 21st of 46 groups.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, IDA & IBRD total or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in IDA & IBRD total as of 2015.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between IDA & IBRD total and South Sudan?
- 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do IDA & IBRD total and South Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- IDA & IBRD total ranks 20th and South Sudan ranks 21st of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.