Belize vs Congo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia

Belize
31,006 current US$
in 2023
Congo
35,509 current US$
in 2016
Belize rank
114th
Congo rank
111th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia over time

  • Belize
  • Congo
0500.0k1.0M1.5M198220022023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 35,509 current US$ against 31,006 current US$ in Belize, a difference of 4,503 current US$.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Congo ahead.

Belize ranks 114th and Congo ranks 111th of 163 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Congo Difference Ahead
1980s 10,000 current US$ 10,000 current US$ 0 current US$
1990s 10,000 current US$ 20,000 current US$ 10,000 current US$ Congo
2010s 410,612 current US$ 278,391 current US$ 132,220 current US$ Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia, Belize or Congo?
Congo, at 35,509 current US$ against 31,006 current US$ in Belize as of 2016.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia between Belize and Congo?
4,503 current US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Congo?
8 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2016.
How do Belize and Congo rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia?
Belize ranks 114th and Congo ranks 111th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
210 places, 7,317 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.