Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kosovo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Kosovo
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports 14,841 current US$ against 14,182 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 659 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 133rd and Kosovo ranks 130th of 165 countries.
Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19,414 current US$ | 63,646 current US$ | 44,232 current US$ | Kosovo |
| 2020s | 18,297 current US$ | 68,696 current US$ | 50,400 current US$ | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kosovo?
- Kosovo, at 14,841 current US$ against 14,182 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo?
- 659 current US$, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 133rd and Kosovo ranks 130th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.