Botswana vs Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia over time
- Botswana
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 120,000 current US$ against 117,058 current US$ in Botswana, a difference of 2,942 current US$.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Botswana ranks 85th and Hong Kong, China ranks 84th of 164 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong, China in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16,667 current US$ | 16,667 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 1970s | 47,778 current US$ | 23,333 current US$ | 24,444 current US$ | Botswana |
| 1980s | 866,000 current US$ | 3.96 million current US$ | 3.09 million current US$ | Hong Kong, China |
| 1990s | 1.26 million current US$ | 1.90 million current US$ | 640,000 current US$ | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia, Botswana or Hong Kong, China?
- Hong Kong, China, at 120,000 current US$ against 117,058 current US$ in Botswana as of 1996.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia between Botswana and Hong Kong, China?
- 2,942 current US$, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Hong Kong, China?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 1996.
- How do Botswana and Hong Kong, China rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia?
- Botswana ranks 85th and Hong Kong, China ranks 84th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.