Burundi vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia

Burundi
1.55 million current US$
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo
1.30 million current US$
in 2023
Burundi rank
51st
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
52nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia over time

  • Burundi
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M198220022023

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 1.55 million current US$ against 1.30 million current US$ in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 251,610 current US$.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.2 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Burundi ranks 51st and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 52nd of 163 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Democratic Republic of Congo in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Democratic Republic of Congo Difference Ahead
1980s 10,000 current US$ 50,000 current US$ 40,000 current US$ Democratic Republic of Congo
1990s 95,000 current US$ 45,000 current US$ 50,000 current US$ Burundi
2000s 160,000 current US$ 6.86 million current US$ 6.70 million current US$ Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s 945,095 current US$ 4.67 million current US$ 3.72 million current US$ Democratic Republic of Congo
2020s 1.50 million current US$ 3.14 million current US$ 1.64 million current US$ Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia, Burundi or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Burundi, at 1.55 million current US$ against 1.30 million current US$ in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia between Burundi and Democratic Republic of Congo?
251,610 current US$, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Democratic Republic of Congo?
17 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia?
Burundi ranks 51st and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 52nd of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
210 places, 7,317 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.