Comoros vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia over time
- Comoros
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 1,175 current US$ against 1,125 current US$ in Comoros, a difference of 50 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 155th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 154th of 164 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 2 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 502,500 current US$ | 45,000 current US$ | 457,500 current US$ | Comoros |
| 1990s | 280,000 current US$ | 15,000 current US$ | 265,000 current US$ | Comoros |
| 2010s | 181,394 current US$ | 492,587 current US$ | 311,193 current US$ | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2020s | 25,172 current US$ | 36,051 current US$ | 10,879 current US$ | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia, Comoros or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 1,175 current US$ against 1,125 current US$ in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia between Comoros and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 50 current US$, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia?
- Comoros ranks 155th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 154th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.