Grenada vs Suriname: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia

Grenada
770 current US$
in 2023
Suriname
2,775 current US$
in 2023
Grenada rank
155th
Suriname rank
152nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia over time

  • Grenada
  • Suriname
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M197820002023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 2,775 current US$ against 770 current US$ in Grenada, a difference of 2,005 current US$.

That makes Suriname's figure about 3.6 times Grenada's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Grenada ahead.

Grenada ranks 155th and Suriname ranks 152nd of 163 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Suriname Difference Ahead
2010s 334,657 current US$ 190,648 current US$ 144,009 current US$ Grenada
2020s 10,215 current US$ 17,824 current US$ 7,609 current US$ Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia, Grenada or Suriname?
Suriname, at 2,775 current US$ against 770 current US$ in Grenada as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia between Grenada and Suriname?
2,005 current US$, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Suriname?
12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Grenada and Suriname rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia?
Grenada ranks 155th and Suriname ranks 152nd of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
210 places, 7,317 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.