Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia over time
- Guinea
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 47,805 current US$ against 43,882 current US$ in Guinea, a difference of 3,923 current US$.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 106th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 104th of 164 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 114,577 current US$ | 80,387 current US$ | 34,191 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2020s | 33,364 current US$ | 31,666 current US$ | 1,698 current US$ | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia, Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 47,805 current US$ against 43,882 current US$ in Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia between Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 3,923 current US$, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia?
- Guinea ranks 106th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 104th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.