Hong Kong, China vs Lesotho: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 121,029 current US$ against 120,000 current US$ in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 1,029 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 84th and Lesotho ranks 83rd of 164 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 3 and Lesotho in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17,500 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 7,500 current US$ | Hong Kong, China |
| 1970s | 22,000 current US$ | 82,000 current US$ | 60,000 current US$ | Lesotho |
| 1980s | 3.96 million current US$ | 446,000 current US$ | 3.51 million current US$ | Hong Kong, China |
| 1990s | 1.90 million current US$ | 708,571 current US$ | 1.19 million current US$ | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia, Hong Kong, China or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 121,029 current US$ against 120,000 current US$ in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia between Hong Kong, China and Lesotho?
- 1,029 current US$, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Lesotho?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 1996.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Lesotho rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 84th and Lesotho ranks 83rd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.